In the complex landscape of family law, the term “mistress law” may not be legal jargon.
Still, it has become a colloquial expression to describe the legal implications surrounding extra-marital relationships in Australia.
This article delves into the intricate aspects of mistress law, exploring whether an extra-marital affair can be considered a de facto relationship and what measures can be taken to protect property when entering such a relationship.
Is An Extra-Marital Affair A De Facto Relationship?
The concept of a de facto relationship in Australia is defined under the Family Law Act 1975.
It refers to a relationship between two adults who live together on a genuine domestic basis but are not legally married.
In the context of mistress law, an extra-marital affair may or may not be considered a de facto relationship.
The court will look at various factors such as the nature and extent of the common residence, the length of the relationship, financial dependence, ownership of property, and the care and support of children.
An extra-marital affair might be considered a de facto relationship if it meets the legal criteria.
What Can Be Done To Protect Your Property If You Are Entering Into An Extra-Marital Relationship?
Entering an extra-marital relationship can have significant legal implications, especially concerning property rights. Here’s what you can do to protect your assets:
1. Binding Financial Agreement (BFA): A BFA is a legal agreement that outlines how assets will be divided if the relationship ends. It can be entered before, during, or after a de facto relationship or marriage.
2. Legal Consultation: Engaging a family lawyer experienced in mistress law can provide tailored advice on protecting your assets. They can help draft agreements that suit your unique situation.
3. Transparency with Partner: Open communication with your partner about financial expectations and agreements can prevent misunderstandings and legal disputes down the line.
4. Understanding De Facto Laws: Familiarise yourself with the laws governing de facto relationships in your state or territory, as they may vary across Australia.
John Thompson, found himself in a precarious situation. Married to Sara Thompson for 15 years, John had begun an extra-marital relationship with Emily Davis, a colleague.
When Sara discovered the affair, she filed for divorce, and Emily subsequently claimed a share in John’s assets, arguing that their relationship constituted a de facto relationship.
We had to delve into the intimate details of John and Emily’s relationship to determine whether it met the legal criteria for a de facto relationship.
This involved examining their shared financial responsibilities, time spent together, and the nature of their relationship.
We meticulously reviewed financial records, property ownership, and other evidence to build a strong case.
The case required us to navigate the intricate landscape of family law, including the definitions and implications of de facto relationships in Australia.
After a thorough examination of the evidence, the court ruled in our favour, determining that John and Emily’s relationship did not meet the criteria for a de facto relationship.
The secretive nature of the affair and the lack of a shared residence were key factors in the decision.
Emily’s claim was dismissed, and John’s assets remained protected. The case was a significant victory for our firm and a reminder of the complexities surrounding mistress law.
Always Seek Legal Assistance
Mistress law in Australia is a multifaceted subject that intertwines with family law, de facto relationships, and property rights—understanding whether an extra-marital affair qualifies as a de facto relationship and taking proactive steps to protect property.
Legal consultation is often advisable to navigate the complexities of mistress law, ensuring that individual rights and assets are safeguarded.
The landscape of extra-marital relationships is ever-evolving, reflecting the changing dynamics of relationships in contemporary Australian society.